Arbitration
Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution mechanism, wherein the parties mutually decide to come together and submit their disputes before a neutral party called an Arbitrator, for the resolution of the disputes via the enforcement of a legally binding arbitral award made at the end of the arbitration proceedings. The Central Government enacted the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, amended in the years 2015 and 2021, which deals with the entire process and legal implications of Arbitration.
About Arbitrator
An Arbitrator is a neutral party that sits through the Arbitration proceedings, and accordingly adjudicates upon the dispute in the form of an Arbitral award which is legally binding and enforceable upon both the parties. An Arbitrator can be of any nationality, and the parties to a dispute are free to mutually decide upon their arbitrator and can appoint anyone they deem fit. Arbitration also allows the parties to amicably agree upon a procedure for arbitration, subject to the terms of the arbitration agreement, after the appointment of the Arbitrator. To initiate the appointment of an arbitrator, either of the parties may send a request to the other party. However, if the parties do not come to common grounds for the appointment of the arbitrator within 30 days from the receipt of request, then either of the parties may approach the High Court of appropriate jurisdiction, and the appointment shall be made by the Chief Justice of the High Court, as per Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Multiple arbitrators can also be appointed to the arbitration of a dispute, however, the number of appointed arbitrators should always remain odd.
Advantages of Arbitration
The rampant piling up of non-penal matters has overburdened the Courts of Law, and consequently slowed down the procedure of adjudication of justice. Comparatively, Arbitration is a much faster and efficient process because there exists a time period of 12 months within which an Arbitral Tribunal is bound to complete the arbitration since its engagement. Arbitration offers confidentiality to the parties by providing an opportunity to resolve their disputes amicably in a private place. The parties to Arbitration can choose the governing law, seat, and the procedure for Arbitration making it a more flexible option than litigation. The Arbitral Tribunal normally consists of industry experts as Arbitrators, and therefore, leading to a more informed and accurate resolution of the dispute. Moreover, the Arbitral Awards are enforceable and legally binding, which ensures the finality of the resolution.
Kinds of Arbitration
There are three types of Arbitration:
- Institutional Arbitration
- Ad Hoc Arbitration
- Fast Track Arbitration
An Arbitration Organization is an institute which oversees and administers arbitration under its own rules and regulations. Institutional Arbitration is wherein the parties refer the dispute to such an organization, and the arbitration procedure is then carried out according to the rules of that institution. Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), and London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) are some examples of arbitration institutions.
Ad hoc arbitration occurs wherein institutional arbitration is not engaged, thus, the parties decide upon the procedure, the rules and regulations for the arbitration proceedings.
Fast Track Arbitration is intended to be completed at an even faster rate than traditional arbitration. Usually deployed for frivolous disputes or disputes with low valuation, the time period for the same is 6 months, which can be extended subject to the needs and consent of the parties.
Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement is a contract wherein the parties to a dispute agree to alternative dispute resolution via arbitration. As a general practice, an arbitration clause in an agreement is regarded as the arbitration agreement. An agreement to arbitrate is valid only if the current dispute is explicitly covered under the clauses of that agreement. An arbitration agreement should always be in the written form and the parties should be a signatory to the same i.e. “Consensus Ad Idem” is crucial and significant.
The Arbitration Agreement can cover a plethora of issues for the ease of appointment of the arbitrator, and the arbitration proceedings. The procedure of the appointment of the arbitrator, as well as the language of the proceedings can be decided by the parties.
Lack of Arbitration Agreement
In the absence of an arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties, or the lack of an arbitration agreement, the parties may agree to sign a fresh arbitration agreement for the resolution of the current disputes. If the parties do not come to an agreement for arbitration, then either of the parties may file a civil suit under the Court of appropriate jurisdiction, and if the case is pending, then move an application under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for settlement of disputes outside the court. If the court deems fit, then the dispute of the parties may be referred for arbitration. In cases wherein the arbitration agreement exists, but the party does not initiate the arbitration despite the receipt of the notice by the other party, then under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 the appropriate High Court or the Supreme Court can appoint an arbitrator after an application is made by any of the parties.
Breach of Arbitration Agreement
If one party breaches the arbitration agreement or refuses to comply with its terms, the aggrieved party can take legal action to seek enforcement of the agreement. In domestic matters, the aggrieved party can make an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. This section mandates that if a party presents a case before a judicial authority and there is a valid arbitration agreement, the judicial authority must not entertain any further judicial proceedings and must refer the parties to arbitration. For cases involving international subject matter, an application can be made under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. This section provides for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in India. If there is a valid arbitration agreement and the dispute falls within the scope of that agreement, the court will refer the parties to arbitration. These statutory provisions play a crucial role in enforcing arbitration agreements and ensuring that parties abide by their contractual obligations to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than litigation.
Arbitral Award
Once the arbitration award is issued by the arbitrator(s), it is considered final and binding upon the parties involved, similar to a decree or court order. The award sets out the decision of the arbitrator(s) on the matters in dispute and can include both monetary and non-monetary resolutions.
After the award is passed, there are a few steps that typically follow:
- Notification: The arbitrator(s) sends a copy of the award to each party involved in the arbitration process. This serves as a formal notification of the decision.
- Award Examination: Upon receiving the award, each party has the opportunity to review and examine it. They may seek legal advice from arbitration lawyers to understand its implications and determine the next course of action.
- Challenge Period: In some jurisdictions, there is a specific time period within which a party can challenge the arbitration award. This typically involves filing an application to set aside or annul the award in court. The grounds for challenging an award are usually limited and may include issues such as procedural irregularities or lack of jurisdiction.
- Award Enforcement: If the award is not challenged within the specified timeframe or if a challenge is unsuccessful, the award becomes final and enforceable. The winning party can then take steps to enforce the award and seek its implementation. The process of enforcing the award may involve applying to a court for its recognition and enforcement.
- Execution: Once the award is recognized and enforced by a court, it can be executed in accordance with the rules and procedures applicable to the enforcement of court judgments. This may involve seizing assets, garnishing bank accounts, or taking other measures to satisfy the awarded amount or comply with the terms of the award.
Challenging an Arbitral Award
The arbitration award holds legal force and can only be contested in specific situations as outlined in Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Circumstances for challenging the award include instances where the terms of the arbitration agreement were not followed, the agreement itself is void, proper notice was not provided to the applicant, the subject matter of the dispute is beyond the scope of arbitration, the award contravenes public policy, or the proceedings involved corruption or fraud. The challenge to an arbitration award must be initiated within three months from the date of the award.
Additionally, apart from the final awards, there are also interim orders issued by the arbitral tribunal or the court in specific circumstances. These interim orders serve to address particular issues or provide temporary relief during the arbitration proceedings. They may include injunctions, orders to preserve assets, or other necessary measures to safeguard the rights and interests of the parties.
Interim Orders
An interim order refers to a temporary measure granted by both the arbitral tribunal and the court under Section 9 and Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. It serves to provide relief to the applicant and safeguard the interests of the parties in a specific aspect of the dispute. The application for an interim remedy can be made prior to the commencement of arbitration proceedings, during the proceedings, or even before the enforcement of an arbitral award.
There are specific circumstances in which these measures can be granted. They include situations such as appointing a guardian for a minor or a person of unsound mind, securing the amount of the claim, obtaining a temporary injunction, inspecting a property or object, or any other order that the court or tribunal deems necessary or appropriate. The purpose of these interim orders is to maintain stability and protect the rights of the parties involved until a final resolution is reached through the arbitration process.
Challenging an Interim Order
An order granted under Section 9 or Section 17 can be challenged through an appeal to the court. Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 empowers the court to hear appeals against orders issued during the interlocutory stage of the proceedings.
The arbitration process consists of various forms, including international and domestic arbitration. In domestic arbitration, the arbitration takes place within India, with both parties being Indian nationals, and the dispute being resolved in accordance with Indian substantive law. On the other hand, international arbitration involves either the subject matter or the parties to the dispute being from outside of India.
Mediation, conciliation, and arbitration are all forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes. Although they share similarities, it's important to understand their differences. Let's clarify the distinctions between mediation and arbitration, as well as between conciliation and arbitration.
Mediation vs Arbitration
Mediation and arbitration both aim to resolve disputes, but there are distinct differences between the two. Firstly, arbitration in India is governed and regulated by The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while mediation does not have specific statutory regulations. The roles of a mediator and an arbitrator also differ significantly. In mediation, the parties actively participate in finding a mutually agreeable solution, facilitated by the mediator. On the other hand, an arbitrator listens to the facts and evidence presented by the parties and issues a binding award at the conclusion of the proceedings. Mediation takes place during the litigation.
Mediation is a process driven by the parties themselves, where they negotiate and determine the terms of their agreement. In arbitration, the arbitrator plays an equally important role to that of the parties as they are responsible for rendering an award that is legally binding on the parties.
Conciliation vs Arbitration
Conciliation is a method of resolving disputes by appointing a conciliator who assists the parties in finding a mutually acceptable resolution. The conciliator engages in discussions, facilitation, and intervention to help resolve the conflict. They may also provide advice during the process. On the other hand, arbitration is a quasi-judicial proceeding where the parties involved in the dispute agree to appoint an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators to make a binding decision on the matter. Conciliation takes place before the litigation.
The decision made by the arbitrators, referred to as an award, is legally binding on the parties. In contrast, the decision of a conciliator is non-binding and cannot be enforced.
Arbitration is a real asset for any judicial system. It can help in reducing the burden on courts as it is a quicker and more efficient process for anyone who is seeking quick remedy in civil matters. Arbitration ought to be promoted as one of the modes of civil dispute resolution.
-
Domestic Arbitration: At our law firm, we have a specific focus on helping clients with domestic arbitration cases. Our team of experienced arbitration lawyers offers extensive legal support and representation throughout the entire arbitration process. This includes creating arbitration agreements, preparing necessary documents, presenting arguments and working towards settlements through negotiations. Our highly skilled team has in-depth knowledge of domestic arbitration laws and is committed to safeguarding our clients’ interests and advocating for them in the most effective manner possible.
-
International Commercial Arbitration: We help our clients in resolving their cross border disputes via the mode of international commercial arbitration. Our team consists of the best international commercial arbitration lawyers in India. We offer valuable guidance on selecting the right arbitration forums and applicable laws, as well as drafting and negotiating arbitration clauses. Our experienced team advocates for clients in international arbitration proceedings, leverages our in-depth knowledge of the rules and procedures to navigate complex legal matters and secure favorable results.
-
Commercial Disputes: We have the necessary expertise to handle various types of commercial disputes. Our skilled arbitration lawyers provide extensive legal assistance to businesses, ensuring efficient resolution of conflicts. Whether it's addressing contract breaches, shareholder disputes or breach of fiduciary duties, our team is dedicated to safeguarding our clients interests. We employ suitable approaches such as negotiation, alternative dispute resolution methods or litigation strategies depending on the unique requirements of each case.
-
Labor and Employment Disputes: Our law practice specializes in providing valuable legal support to both employers and employees in labor and employment disputes. We handle wrongful terminations, claims of discrimination, salary disputes, and breaches of employment contracts. Our team of arbitration lawyers is adept at deciphering complicated labor regulations, representing clients in negotiations, mediations, or litigation, and pursuing the best possible solutions for our clients.
-
Infrastructure and Energy Disputes: Our firm has extensive experience in handling disputes related to infrastructure and energy projects. We assist clients in resolving complex issues that may arise during project execution, such as contract disputes, regulatory matters, and claims for delays or cost overruns. Our team understands the unique challenges faced by clients in these industries and provides strategic advice and representation to protect their interests and ensure successful project completion.
-
Setting aside of Arbitral Awards: Our law firm provides expert guidance and representation to clients seeking to set aside arbitral awards. We thoroughly analyze the legal grounds and applicable laws to challenge awards that are tainted by procedural irregularities, fraud, or in violation of public policy. Our team's in-depth knowledge of the relevant laws and extensive experience in arbitration proceedings enable us to effectively navigate the process and protect our clients' rights.
-
Challenging Arbitral Awards: If a client believes that an arbitral award is unjust or erroneous, our law firm will assist them challenge it before the court of appropriate jurisdiction. We rigorously evaluate the arbitration procedure and uncover legal grounds for contesting the result, such as legal flaws, factual misinterpretation, or procedural irregularities. Our arbitration lawyers endeavor to get favorable good outcomes for our clients in such difficult situations through our advocacy skills and rigorous methodology.
-
Appeal against orders: Our firm provides skilled representation to clients seeking to appeal against arbitration orders before the appropriate appellate authorities. We carefully analyze the legal aspects of the case, identify errors in the order, and prepare persuasive arguments to present before the appellate body. Our team's knowledge of the appellate process and experience in handling appeals ensures that our clients' interests are effectively advocated for, seeking appropriate remedies and relief.
-
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Our firm focuses on aiding clients with the enforcement of arbitral awards. We assist our clients in enforcing awards both domestically and internationally, ensuring that they realize the full advantages of the arbitration. Our team of arbitration lawyers has vast expertise enforcing awards in compliance with applicable laws and conventions, adopting effective techniques to overcome any obstacles that may develop throughout the enforcement process.
- The firm consists of a team of highly skilled professionals with extensive experience in handling complex arbitration cases. The team possesses in-depth knowledge of both domestic and international arbitration laws, ensuring top-notch representation for the clients.
-
Our team of arbitration lawyers excels in developing customized strategies to suit the specific needs and goals of the clients. We analyze the intricacies of each case and provide personalized solutions to maximize the chances of a favorable outcome.
- The firm ensures comprehensive industry expertise and has profound knowledge of various industries, including finance, real estate, technology, and more. Possessing a thorough understanding of industry-specific knowledge enables us to effectively handle arbitration cases across a wide range of sectors, thereby guaranteeing valuable insights and strategic advice to our clients.
- The team strives to achieve favorable settlements for the clients by leveraging our persuasive communication abilities, strong legal acumen, and command over arbitration procedures. We are one of the best Arbitration lawyer in Delhi, India.
-
Awarded ‘Top Law Firm’ by FORBES INDIA LEGAL POWERLIST 2021
RR Legal Partners LLP was presented with an award by Forbes India in association with Legitquest for being enlisted as the Top Law Firm in the Legal Powerlist 2021 in recognition of the firm’s work and excellence in the legal profession.
-
Awarded ‘Partner of the Year’ by ASSOCHAM – NATIONAL LEGAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS 2021-22
The Managing Partner of the firm was nominated as ‘Partner of the Year’ by ASSOCHAM National Legal Excellence Awards for the year 2021-2022.
-
Awarded ‘Top Individual Lawyer’ by FORBES INDIA POWERLIST 2022
Partners of the firm were recognized as ‘Top Individual Lawyer’ (Litigation) (above 10 years category) in the Legal Powerlist 2022 presented by Forbes India in association with Legitquest. This achievement reflects their exceptional legal expertise, professional achievements, and unwavering dedication to their legal profession.
-
Awarded ‘Legal – Inspiring Firm (20+ years)’ by LEX – FALCON GLOBAL AWARDS 2023
The firm is conferred with the Lex-Falcon Global Awards 2023 in the category of ‘Legal – Inspiring Firm (20+ years) in Litigation, Arbitration & Cyber Crime matters for their-
-
Overall Reach in a variety of individuals and organizations, signaling the popularity of their consultation.
-
Industry Impact of their counsel in the corresponding industry.
-
Spirit of Innovation being infused by them in the industry and how they are shaping the up-coming leaders.
-
Market Demand of their expertise, both at present and in the future.
-
Future Readiness indicating their capability to meet the growing demands of the industry without compromising their quality.
1. What is Alternative Dispute Resolution?
ADR is a mechanism of dispute resolution which provides to the litigants a resolution process which is an alternative to the regular course of court litigation. ADR is a cost effective, informal, litigant friendly and expeditious mode of dispute resolution.
2. What are the various forms of ADR?
ADR is generally classified into the following types:
- Arbitration
- Negotiation.
- Mediation.
- Conciliation.
In India, Lok Adalat, often known as "people's court," is a non-judicial setting that encourages talks in the presence of a judge and disposes of cases without excessive emphasis on legal specifics, thereby facilitating ADR in a different context.
3. What is Arbitration?
Arbitration is a procedure in which a dispute is brought for adjudication before an arbitrator who is mutually appointed by the parties to the dispute and the arbitral award passed by the arbitrator is binding on the parties. It is a form of private conflict settlement process.
4. What is the difference between arbitration and mediation?
Firstly, arbitration is governed by a specific statute known as the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996, which sets out strict rules and regulations for the entire arbitration proceedings and the appointment of an arbitrator whereas mediation does not have any statute to govern it. The role of a mediator in a mediation process is also very different to that of an arbitrator in the arbitral proceedings. In the mediation process, both the parties try to arrive at a mutually acceptable solution facilitated by the mediator who acts as a bridge whereas the arbitrator adjudicates and renders an award.
The award made in an arbitration case is binding on the parties and may only be disputed on certain grounds whereas in mediation, the settlement reached can be revoked/rejected by either of the parties at any time prior to drawing up of a decree .
5. What is the difference between arbitration and conciliation?
Arbitration is a quasi-judicial proceeding, where the parties to the dispute appoint an arbitrator(s) by agreement to adjudicate upon the said dispute. Conciliation is a method of dispute resolution in which a conciliator is appointed to help bring the parties arrive at a mutually acceptable solution. The conciliator discusses, facilitates and intervenes in the conflict in order to resolve the same.
6. How is arbitration different from litigation?
The major difference between arbitration and litigation could possibly be their approach towards solving disputes. Arbitration is a non-formal dispute adjudication process which is cheaper, more convenient and faster as compared to the conventional litigation process. If you are finding best Arbitration lawyer in Delhi, then we are best option for you.
7. What are the advantages of choosing arbitration?
Arbitration is a non-conventional way of dispute resolution. It works differently than the conventional ways of dispute resolution thereby gaining several advantages over the conventional mode of litigation.
First, the resolution process is faster and much more adaptable. Secondly, it has simplified procedural rules based on principles of natural justice. Litigation on the other hand essentially involves a protracted/prolonged process of submitting documents and appearing in court proceedings. In arbitration, the elaborate rules of court procedures are not followed. And lastly, arbitration as a whole process is cost effective for the litigants.
8. What are the various types of Arbitration?
Arbitration is of three kinds- Institutional, Ad Hoc, and Fast Track Arbitration. Institutional Arbitration is when an arbitration institute is engaged by the parties for dispute resolution. Such arbitration proceedings are carried out in accordance with the rules of that particular arbitration institute such as Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) etc.
Ad Hoc Arbitration is the general kind of arbitration, in which an arbitration institute is not engaged by the parties, and the parties amicably determine the procedure for the appointment of the arbitrator, the conduct of the arbitration procedure thereof and so on and so forth.
Fast Track Arbitration is a faster form of arbitration wherein the arbitration proceedings are concluded within a time period of 6 months as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
9. What are the advantages of different forms of arbitration?
Starting with domestic arbitration, domestic arbitration helps in resolving matters within India and significantly resolves the disputes arising within the country.
Then comes fast track arbitration, fast track as mentioned in section 29 (b) of the arbitration and conciliation act being made for specifically quick resolution of certain matters and is beneficial in those circumstances, thus can significantly help in resolving matters which are urgent within 6 months.
Then there is International Arbitration, which significantly helps in resolving matters pertaining to international subject matters.The parties can enlist the services of international arbitration lawyers to guide them through the process. Choose your Arbitration law firm in Delhi wisely, contact RR Legal's legal advisors for more info.
Next up is ad-hoc arbitration gives the parties the advantage to decide the number of arbitrators in the proceeding and also to determine the manner in which these proceedings are executed.
Lastly in the list of major kinds of arbitration is institutional arbitration, its advantages are the availability of pre-established rules and procedures which ensure the arbitration proceedings begin in a timely manner and also administrative assistance from the institution, which will provide a venue of arbitration. Our law firm is one of the best Arbitration law firm in Delhi, India.
10. Who can invoke arbitration proceedings?
Either of the parties to the dispute may invoke arbitration proceedings in case of any legal dispute arising between the parties, provided they have executed a valid arbitration agreement beforehand.
